ARRRR Matey! Design Piracy Act Hopes to Smooth the Seas for Designers

Latest posts by Heather Schuck (see all)

“Knockoffs” and “Copycats” are too often part of the hard knocks high fashion deals out to young designers.  Years spent perfecting the fit of a signature cocktail dress can be stolen overnight by a larger, more established company with lower price points.  Your signature cocktail dress is now mass market and you won’t see a dime.  To help change this harsh reality, many of today’s hottest fashion designers, such as Narciso Rodriguez and Nicole Miller, are rallying behind The Design Piracy Prohibition Act.  The legislation, introduced in a bi-partisan effort in the Senate, hopes to give independent designers a fighting chance to protect their works. 

To accomplish this, the Act will extend copyright laws to fashion patterns by allowing fashion designers to register their designs with the U.S. Copyright Office for a small fee.  The registration would protect the design for three years and “copycats” found guilty of pilfering designs would be forced to pay damages for the infringement.   While new to the US, copyright protection of fashion designs is not new to the rest of the world.  Similar legislation is currently being enforced in Japan, India, and several countries throughout Europe where the registration last 25 years.  With the US being the only world fashion leader without protection in place, the Piracy Act is a much needed step towards protecting our $350 billion dollar fashion industry. 

As a fashion designer myself, I’m optimistic about the prospect of copyright protection.  Not only does this mean legal protection of my works, but it will add to the value of my company.  All too often, I’ve been in meetings with potential investors to have someone ask the question, “but somebody could knock you off, right?”  It’s a hard question to answer.  Without this legislation designers have to work extremely hard to find unique ways to manufacture their product, use unique materials, or have a unique use that can be patented.  This is often an impossible task and the designer is then left exposed to “knock-offs”.  The Design Piracy Prohibition Act, which is still in committee in the Senate, would come a long way in protecting a designer’s works.  Is it far enough?  I don’t think so, but at least it’s a start!

What do you think?  Pros-Cons?  Comment below or email me at [email protected]

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Ready for Retail?

Next Article

Rick's Magic Beans

Related Posts
supply chain
Read More

How to Keep Vendors and Clients Happy During Supply Chain Hiccups

Supply chain breakdowns are happening due to global disruptions, rising costs and increased consumer expectations. Businesses can't always stop supply chain hiccups, but they can learn from them and limit their impact on vendors and clients. How a business responds to a supply chain issue can have far-flung effects. A company that is proactive and...
implementing new systems
Read More

9 Mistakes to Avoid When Implementing New Systems

If your systems aren’t lean, efficient and precise, you’re wasting time and money while putting your business at unnecessary risk. If you’re going to build out new systems, you need to do it right. Avoid these nine mistakes when building new systems to transform how work gets done in your business. 1. Ignoring human nature...
home-based businesses
Read More

The Value of Home-Based Businesses to Economic Recovery

The challenge of America’s economic recovery, in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, is to spread it to every community – and especially those that have been historically excluded. The key to meeting that challenge is to appreciate the civic and economic value of an overlooked resource: home-based businesses. There are about 16 million home-based...
E&O insurance
Read More

Your Technology Company Needs E&O Insurance: Here’s Why

Every business has unique risks that can seriously harm its operations if not properly addressed. As a business utilizing technology to produce and deliver products or services, it’s important to recognize and take precautions against risks that your commercial general liability (CGL) coverage doesn’t include. Technology professional liability coverage, also referred to as tech errors...